• Users Online: 337
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
PHOTO ESSAY
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 984-985

Bandage contact lens – The master masquerader


Department of Ophthalmology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission21-Jan-2022
Date of Acceptance25-Jul-2022
Date of Web Publication11-Oct-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Alok Sati
Professor (Cornea and Anterior Segment Surgeon), Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi - 110 010
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_196_22

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Keywords: Bandage Contact Lens, corneal deposition, corneal dystrophy


How to cite this article:
Joshi A, Mishra SK, Sati A, Kumar P. Bandage contact lens – The master masquerader. Indian J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2022;2:984-5

How to cite this URL:
Joshi A, Mishra SK, Sati A, Kumar P. Bandage contact lens – The master masquerader. Indian J Ophthalmol Case Rep [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 30];2:984-5. Available from: https://www.ijoreports.in/text.asp?2022/2/4/984/358160



A 60-year-old gentleman presented to our cornea clinic with a complaint of diminution of vision. On examination, the following were observed: the distance visual acuity (DVA) right eye (RE)- 6/9, left eye (LE)- hand movement close to face (HMCF), intraocular pressure (IOP) by applanation tonometry RE- 18 mmHg, LE- not recorded; slit-lamp examination RE was normal and LE revealed mild ciliary congestion with a bandage contact lens (BCL) in situ and multiple opaque protein deposits in the center, giving the corneal surface a mulberry-like appearance [Figure 1]. On removal of the lens, the cornea was found to be healthy [Figure 2] with a normal posterior segment. DVA left eye was 6/9 with an IOP of 16 mmHg.
Figure 1: Image showing protein deposits accumulated over the central part of the bandage contact lens

Click here to view
Figure 2: Image of clear, healthy cornea after removal of the bandage contact lens

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


This patient was seen by various general ophthalmologists in the periphery and was pigeonholed as a corneal dystrophy. As apprised by the patient, a BCL was placed in his left eye in 2019 following some corneal infection. The world was subsequently struck by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and he was lost to follow-up. He confessed to being oblivious with regard to this BCL in his eye and approached an ophthalmologist only on experiencing diminution of vision. Scrupulous slit-lamp examination divulged a potential space between the posterior surface of the lens and the anterior surface of cornea, distinctly validating it to be a retained BCL enshrouding a healthy cornea [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Image of the bandage contact lens being held by a forcep, after removal from the eye

Click here to view


Lens deposition commences within minutes of wear and is governed by multifarious factors, including patient compliance, individual tear chemistry, and environment.[1] Protein deposits, however, occur as lysozyme binds to the lens surface and alters its morphology.

We did an extensive PubMed search and encountered reports of lost BCL in the fornix masquerading as a mass or chalazion, but could not find a single report misjudging BCL with protein deposits as a corneal dystrophy.[2]

To the best of our knowledge, we are reporting such a case for the first time with an aim to share this interesting image with our fellows and trainees to encourage a thorough slit-lamp evaluation to promptly detect such masqueraders.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Mann A, Tighe B. Contact lens interactions with the tear film. Exp Eye Res 2013;117:88-98.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ho DKH Mathews JP. Folded bandage contact lens retention in a patient with bilateral dry eye symptoms: A case report. BMC Ophthalmol 2017;17:116.  Back to cited text no. 2
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Discussion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed206    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded41    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]