|
|
OPHTHALMIC IMAGE |
|
Year : 2021 | Volume
: 1
| Issue : 2 | Page : 179 |
|
Bilateral outer retinal hole following electrocution
Amber Amar Bhayana, Shorya Vardhan Azad, Priyanka Prasad, Priyadarshana Bardoloi, Vishnu Todi
Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
Date of Web Publication | 01-Apr-2021 |
Correspondence Address: Dr. Shorya Vardhan Azad Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2771_20
How to cite this article: Bhayana AA, Azad SV, Prasad P, Bardoloi P, Todi V. Bilateral outer retinal hole following electrocution. Indian J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2021;1:179 |
How to cite this URL: Bhayana AA, Azad SV, Prasad P, Bardoloi P, Todi V. Bilateral outer retinal hole following electrocution. Indian J Ophthalmol Case Rep [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 14];1:179. Available from: https://www.ijoreports.in/text.asp?2021/1/2/179/312397 |
A 27-year-old-male accidentally electrocuted himself from an overhead transmission (alternating current) line while working and presented as a case of post electrocution bilateral outer retinal macular hole [[Figure 1]a-right, d-left- white arrow] which was confirmed on swept-source optical coherence tomography [[Figure 1]b-right, e-left]. Retinal periphery didn't show any other abnormalities [[Figure 1]c-right, f-left]. The patient was explained guarded prognosis and was advised monthly follow up. Complications like cataract, vitreous hemorrhage, vascular occlusions, retinal detachments, macular cyst, macular holes, optic neuropathy and atrophy post electrocution can lead to vision loss.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5] We report a case of bilateral outer retinal hole following accidental electrocution at work place. | Figure 1: Right eye. (a) Fundus photograph showing lamellar hole, white arrow. (b) Swept source optical coherence tomography confirming outer lamellar hole. (c) Ultrawide field photograph; Left eye. (d) Fundus photograph showing lamellar hole, white arrow. (e) Swept source optical coherence tomography confirming outer lamellar hole. (f) Ultrawide field photograph
Click here to view |
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References | |  |
1. | Robert E, Raymond M, Paul F. Electrical injuries: Engineering, medical and legal aspects. 2 nd ed. Lawyers: Judges Publishing Company; 2004. p. 401. |
2. | Rajagopal J, Shetty SB, Kamath AG, Kamath GG. Macular hole following electrical shock injury. Can J Ophthalmol 2010;45:187-8. |
3. | Ranjan R, Manayath GJ, Dsouza P, Narendran V. Spontaneous anatomical and functional recovery of bilateral electric shock maculopathy. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:1256-61.  [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
4. | Bayar SA, Sarigul A, Yilmaz G, Pinarci EY. Development of optic neuropathy and foveal pseudocyst in a case of high-voltage electrical injury: A three-year follow-up. Turkish J Opthalmol 2014;44:410-2. |
5. | Ouyang P, Karapetyan A, Cui J, Duan X. Bilateral impending macular holes after a high-voltage electrical shock injury and its surgical outcome: A case report. J Med Case Rep 2014;8:399. |
[Figure 1]
|