• Users Online: 64
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
OPHTHALMIC IMAGE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 17

Piggyback intraocular lenses


1 Department of Glaucoma, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Vitreo-Retina, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Web Publication31-Dec-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Chitaranjan Mishra
Department of Vitreo-Retinal Services, Aravind Eye Hospital, Anna Nagar, Madurai - 625 020, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1628_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Rajendrababu S, Mishra C. Piggyback intraocular lenses. Indian J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2021;1:17

How to cite this URL:
Rajendrababu S, Mishra C. Piggyback intraocular lenses. Indian J Ophthalmol Case Rep [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 2];1:17. Available from: https://www.ijoreports.in/text.asp?2021/1/1/17/305497



A 45-year-female diagnosed as bilateral nanophthalmos presented for cataract surgery in the right eye (RE). Her ocular biometry revealed an axial length of 15.20 mm and required an intraocular lens (IOL) power of 64.50 D using Hoffer Q formula.[1] She underwent cataract surgery with piggyback IOL implantation, with a +40 D polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) lens in the bag and +20 D PMMA lens in the sulcus [Figure 1]. Mild displacement of the sulcus IOL was noted at 2 weeks postsurgery. However, since there was no visual complaint the patient was observed only.[2] The vision in the RE was 20/120 at 3 months postsurgery. Piggyback IOLs are suitable for eyes requiring higher IOL power. Mild decentration of IOL without visual symptoms needs observation only.
Figure 1: Slit-lamp image showing piggyback IOLs

Click here to view


Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Gavin EA, Hammond CJ. Intraocular lens power calculation in short eyes. Eye 2008;22:935-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Joshaghani M, Soleimani M, Foroutan A, Yaseri M. Visual outcomes and complications of piggyback intraocular lens implantation compared to aphakia for infantile cataract. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2015;22:495-501.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed234    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded31    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]